WNST - Baltimore Sports Radio

Ravens Orioles Terps Blast Towson   Free The Birds
High School REC Loyola UMBC Login Register

NOW AT BAT
NOW AT BAT

On The Show Today:
1. Dan Connolly - covers MLB - Baltimore Sun
2. Aaron Wilson - Covers the Ravens - Carroll 
    County Times - Co-Host of the Saturday Morning 
    Ravens Football Show
3. Steve Kyler - covers the NBA - Hoopsworld.com 
    SportsRadio 1470 Tampa
4. Casey Willett - Ravens Report / Orioles Report
5. Your Calls 410-481-1570

WNST Bucks - Coupons from our sponsors!


Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!
Location: BlogsBlogsGary Quill's Blog    
Posted by: Gary Quill 6/8/2008 1:49 PM
I apologize for the length of this blog, but it will be my last one until live racing returns to Maryland in August. Have an enjoyable Summer!
 
Something happened on the way to the coronation of Big Brown as the first Triple Crown winner in 30 years. It’s called history. It seems as if from the time Big Brown crossed the finish line on May 3rd at Churchill Downs, we all put on the rose colored glasses and never took them off until after witnessing Big Brown finish last in the 140th running of the Belmont Stakes.

Let’s face it. Everyone, from the most notable horse racing expert to the novice, we all got caught up in the hype and hope that the Triple Crown drought would end this year. Well the horse racing gods were not ready to make that happen. We want one so bad that we ignored logic and blindly believe each year the Derby and Preakness winner might be the second coming of Secretariat.
 
Do I think the fact that Big Brown did not have his monthly dose of steroids in May is 100% to blame for his flop in the Belmont? No. In my humble opinion, there were many other factors…
 
# 1 – The hoof. Whether the quarter crack bothered him during the race or not, his training schedule was compromised due to it. Athletes know that if they don’t practice for a week before a big game, you’re not going to be on top of your game.  
 
# 2 – The heat. Sure, all of the horses had to deal with it, but looking at Big Brown on the track prior to the race, it was obvious to me that he was not handling it well. No replay will show the Post Parade, but if you watch the replay as they enter the clubhouse (first) turn from the rear, he appeared to be the only one with excessive kidney sweat (the white lather between a horses ass, to put it bluntly). Without getting too graphic, imagine if you were a runner and had to run the longest race of your life and you had “stuff back there”. I doubt that you could run your best.       

# 3 – Rank. Again, watching the replay for the first couple furlongs, he fought jockey Kent Desormeaux, throwing his head, using unnecessary energy very early in the race. 

# 4 – Pace. In my pre-race analysis blog, I stated that there was only one horse (Da’ Tara) except Big Brown who would want to be on the lead. When Big Brown did not challenge for that lead, Da’ Tara’s jockey Alan Garcia was able to slow the pace down to the point that the eventual winner had plenty left in the tank to hold off the rest of the field in the stretch. “Pace makes the race” is one of the oldest rules of horse racing.
 
# 5 – Eibar Coa. The jockey on Tale Of Ekati (#7). Again, watch the replay. Going into the first turn, Desormeaux attempted to come off the rail and stalk Da’ Tara. Coa was not going to let that happen. He rushed Tale Of Ekati up to cutoff Big Brown, forcing him to check and then swing to the outside of Tale Of Ekati. Coa continued to sacrifice his mounts chances by keeping him 6 wide throughout the backstretch, with Big Brown to his right, 7 wide.
 
# 6 – Money. Odds of 1-4 are short enough, but I thought they would have been 1-9. After all, he convincingly won the Preakness at 1-5. There must have been tens of thousands of $2 bettors purchasing their souvenir $2 WIN ticket on Big Brown. That alone would have made him 1-4. So the big money (insiders) may have sensed on Saturday morning that he was not on top of his game?!   
 
… and this is why they put the horses in the gate and make them run 1½ miles around the track before they award the Triple Crown to the winner of the Derby and Preakness. 
 
 
Recapping Day 30 (June 7th) of the Pimlico Spring Meet …
 
Best Bet, Kaufy Big Shot (# 3; 2nd race; 8-5) helped me go out on a winning note, even though the return was pretty poultry, paying $4.40 WIN and $2.60 PLACE. There was no SHOW wagering due to the small field of four horses.

Longshot, Queen Rio (# 8; 9th race on the turf; 8-1) was running in her first lifetime race and appeared that she just needed the opportunity to get out and run, as she finished ahead of only 2 horses after trailing the field for most of the race at 10-1.  
 
 
The 2008 Pimlico Spring Meet is now history. From my point of view it was a success. The majority of races had an adequate number of starters to draw betting interest. Many prohibitive favorites failed, which believe it or not is good thing. When favorites seem to always win, it tends to deflate handicappers ability in trying to find price horses.
 
I’ve enjoyed posting blogs for each live racing day at Pimlico. In reviewing my Best Bet and Longshot selections, The Daily Racing Form comment line on my performance would probably be “Early speed; faded”. Early in the meet I picked five (5) consecutive Best Bet winners. Throughout the meet my Longshot picks were often duds, but did manage to get a couple winners and quite a few in the money. My best pick turned out to be Student Council in the Pimlico Special, who paid $16.80.
 
Over the next eight weeks, there will be no live horse racing in the state of Maryland as Magna Entertainment tracks give way to Colonial Downs in Virginia. I will also take a hiatus from this blog to enjoy plenty of outdoor activities with my family.
 
Special thanks to Nestor who believed that my passion for horse racing would be beneficial to blog readers of the WNST website. Thank you Marc and Andrew Unger. You were the first WNST on-air radio personalities to give my blog exposure and introduce the WNST listening audience to me. I’m thankful for the new friendships I have gained with fellow WNST bloggers and associates… specifically Chris Voxakis, Ed Frankovic and Jason Jubb. And last but certainly not least, you, who read my blogs. I write the blog because I love to share my thoughts on horse racing with whoever is willing to read it. Your comments have inspired me to continue my quest to expand the horse racing audience both locally and nationally.
 
Enjoy your Summer. Look for my blog when live racing returns to Maryland in August. 
Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (12)   Add Comment
Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By ed on 6/8/2008 10:26 PM

Great blog Gary, this is the best list of possible reasons why Big Brown didn't win yet from everything I've read on the web. We all have to remember, he is an animal, so we might never know. Anyways, on our bus trip up to Belmont on Saturday we got word from Nestor via you that the great Jim McKay passed away. Having been to the last failed Triple Crown chance with Smarty Jones in 2004 and hearing the news at Belmont that day that President Reagan had died I didn't think that McKay's passing would be a good omen for Big Brown. Looks like I was right. I read somewhere on the web these past 24 hours that the great jockey Eddie Arcaro said back in 1986 that no horse would ever win the Triple Crown again. Looks like he may be right because 3 races in 5 weeks seems like too difficult a toll on these fragile modern day horses. (GQ replied: Unfortunately, this industry has been breeding for speed and not endurance, so Arcaro just might be right.)


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Joe of Bel Air on 6/8/2008 10:27 PM

GQ, I enjoyed reading your blog for the last 2 months. Thanks for all your insights. Look forward to your return. Take care and have a great summer.


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Big T on 6/8/2008 10:34 PM

Gary - Congrats on a successful Pimlico spring meeting with your blog and thanks to Nasty for giving you a shot!! It was good to see you on Preakness Day in my happy Section 8. I think you should forward your list of Big Brown's Belmont excuses to THE Andrew Beyer, if that was indeed he who posted a comment Friday?!? Anyway, your Harford County supporters are proud of your efforts and I look forward to the late summer and fall meets in Maryland, and most importantly your Breeders Cup picks. By the way, I will celebrate my 50th birthday (8/24 but don't tell anyone!!) at Saratoga on Travers Weekend. I can't wait and I may get you to text me your selections for a few races on Travers Day (8/23). Maybe BB will make his return for that race, hopefully with a new trainer. Have a great summer and keep on picking winners! (GQ replied: Big T I'm jealous. A visit to The Spa has still eluded me. I agree with you... BB with a different trainer... one who will stand in front of a camera in bad times as well as good. Welcome to the Half-Century Club!)


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Jason Jubb on 6/8/2008 10:41 PM

Nice job with the Pimlico meet. Day after day you brought insight that even an experience horseplayer would overlook. With the Belmont I agree that the heat and a less than favorable trip worked against Big Brown. Having to check twice and being boxed in took a lot out of him. I question what would have happened if Desormeaux had let Big Brown go to the lead since the fractions were not unreasonable. You said it best on Saturday, there is always the "equine element" which is impossible to predict. (GQ replied: Probably after over 40 years of following horse racing, I'm finally starting to get wise and proceed with caution with these sure things?!)


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Linda Allman on 6/8/2008 10:44 PM

Hey, we can analyze all we want but it is still Damn Sad!!!! Big Brown is a HORSE for crying out loud and subject to moods, heat, exhaustion and just plain, "I'm not doing it today." I am sure the horse senses the excitement but they don't know that so much is riding on this win. It is what makes this sport exciting. Thanks for doing this Gary. We enjoyed our "Day at the Races" with you.


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Eric1115 on 6/9/2008 11:04 AM

GQ - I enjoyed your blog and look forward to your return after the Colonial Downs meet. I miss the days when trainers ran their horses every week. How ironic that the "Derby Trial" has become a prep race for the Preakness. (GQ replied: At least this year the Barbaro Stakes, run on the Preakness Day undercard served as a prep race for the Belmont... for Da' Tara.)


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Big Momma on 6/9/2008 12:10 PM

GQ...You outdid yourself with your final blog. It was the best I have read in a long time and your analysis of the Belmont was outstanding. We have read everyone you wrote and look forward to the fall. Just hope Nestor knows he has a winner and we thank him for giving you a chance. (GQ replied: Hey, I'm used to people saying to me, "You're a real winner...". I think you know what you mean. Thanks for your support!)


Re: Horse Racing Lesson #1: There are no sure things!    By Frank from Abingdon on